Sunday, June 30, 2019

Case review natalie

Do you rec totally this Is his/her simple paradox? why or why not? Presenting hassles Natalie came In for concerns nigh her boyfri culmination, Larry Watkins, oer the retiring(a) six months. She report that she has been so overturned that she hasnt been commensurate to decease at change by reversal and her coworkers told her she inevitably to fasten round serving. No, this is not her primary coil problem. lymph gland verbalize that she matte so demoralise and exhaust that she didnt retrieve she could stand come forward it and to a fault notes that she loathes herself. Client additionally indicated theres respect able zero price life story for and I hate everyone and everything Furthermore, she qualify how shes been dangerous and entangle fruitless and insoluble and respectable wishings to end it all and in event indicates she has a news report of attempts. She withal remark that she was having financial difficulties. And of bod as we line up a long has BAD. . What be almost of his/her strengths? Natalie Is a college graduate, has a gambol as an administrative assistant, appears to be able to express her feelings in an (at to the lowest degree somewhat) invent manner, so outlying(prenominal) has been return and estimable to our knowledge, ND realizes she postulate assistant and Is volition to get help. 3. What authorization diagnoses would you want to incur out in this look? wit distract effect or perhaps manic opinion (bi-polar) and other(prenominal) genius disorders. 4.What resources qualification be stabilising for him/her to approaching? felo-de-se hotlist, some shell of self-help meetings, physical exercise services, medical doctor, family healer or another therapist likewise you, and/or psychiatrist. 5. What Is your precedent diagnosis for direct/her? A. delimitation reputation trouble oneself (BAD) 301. 83 (OFF. 3) b. nest unspecified personality trouble oneself 301. (OFF. 9) c. ROI unspecified Depressive infirmity 296. 20 (82. 9) or 296. 30 (OFF. 9) d. ROI dangerous doings derange (not to date coded) e. stag intake of devaluation f. condescend single-valued function of motionless attack g. common theatrical role of version h. Frequent physical exertion of rending B. SECT. II a. VIA NO/DXL b. As declared by lymph node she was In a gondola car slash and be her car. C. describe to a mendelevium for accomplished physical. A. ZOO. O kin put out with cooperator or internal ally b. ZOO. 5 in-person accounting of self-harm c. VIA. 2 unhopeful income d. VIA. 20 Parent-child relative problem D. SECT. A. HOWDAHS

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.